From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8122 invoked by alias); 15 Jun 2005 01:12:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 8092 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Jun 2005 01:12:44 -0000 Received: from w098.z064220152.sjc-ca.dsl.cnc.net (HELO bluesmobile.specifixinc.com) (64.220.152.98) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 01:12:44 +0000 Received: from diveadx (bluesmobile.corp.specifix.com [192.168.1.2]) by bluesmobile.specifixinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C8B016A21; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 18:12:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Fred Fish Reply-To: fnf@specifixinc.com To: gdb-discuss@gnu.org Subject: Re: [Gdb-discuss] Re: x86 Q: why aren't the SSE intrinsics always_inline? Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 01:12:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz , Andrew Haley , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sourceware.org References: <96B69900-04F0-406A-9B53-F74B6D2B8071@apple.com> <17070.41423.645043.983123@zapata.pink> <20050614145552.GA3952@nevyn.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20050614145552.GA3952@nevyn.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200506142112.39968.fnf@specifixinc.com> X-SW-Source: 2005-06/txt/msg00152.txt.bz2 On Tuesday 14 June 2005 10:55, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > better support for inline functions, which is already on the gdb > roadmap Where's the roadmap? I'm just starting to look at this very issue and would be good to know what is planned or in progress. Thanks. -Fred