Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gdb-discuss@gnu.org, gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: x86 Q: why aren't the SSE intrinsics always_inline?
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 14:56:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050614145552.GA3952@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17070.41423.645043.983123@zapata.pink>

[Redirecting off the misnamed gdb-discuss list; please use
gdb@sourceware instead.]

On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 10:22:23AM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
> You have the same problem with Java -- you're stepping through a Java
> program, and all of a sudden you're inside the memory allocator.  What
> we _really_ need is some way to tell gdb "I'm debugging my own
> program, not the library" or somesuch.  Or, and this is less
> desirable, some way to persuade gcc not to output debug info inside
> some inlined functions, although I can't image how a priori you'd
> decide which ones.

It'd be better to handle this in gdb than in gcc, sure.  There's two
parts: better support for inline functions, which is already on the gdb
roadmap, and then some way of selecting which ones to ignore.  And for
that latter, I have no idea how it should look...

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC


       reply	other threads:[~2005-06-14 14:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <96B69900-04F0-406A-9B53-F74B6D2B8071@apple.com>
     [not found] ` <17070.41423.645043.983123@zapata.pink>
2005-06-14 14:56   ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2005-06-15  1:12     ` [Gdb-discuss] " Fred Fish
2005-06-15  1:17       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-06-15  1:48         ` Fred Fish

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050614145552.GA3952@nevyn.them.org \
    --to=drow@false.org \
    --cc=aph@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb-discuss@gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox