From: richard.coe@med.ge.com
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
Cc: Rich Coe <Richard.Coe@med.ge.com>, "H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>,
gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: no stack trace with 2.6.11 and gdb 6.3
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 21:17:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200506102115.QAA91634@morpheus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 10 Jun 2005 15:37:21 EDT." <20050610193720.GA24094@nevyn.them.org>
Daniel Jacobowitz writes:
In a message dated: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 15:37:21 EDT
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 02:20:58PM -0500, Rich Coe wrote:
> > Yes, after I manually run
> > 'add-symbol-file-from-memory 0xffffe000'
> > I can get a valid traceback.
> >
> > Why doesn't this just work like gdb-6.0 on 2.6.7 ?
>
> Your GDB 6.0 was also patched by Red Hat; again, you would have to ask
> them.
In this regard, you are shallow. I think every developer has a
certain expectation that when they type backtrace, that the debugger
accurately display the data. I was merely referencing a previously
release where it works, and now it doesn't.
There is an obvious difference that this is not working.
I'm all for working towards a solution and I don't think you taking pot
shots at Redhat is working toward that end. If you have a beef with
Redhat, I could care less. If you are saying or implying that this is
broken only in a Redhat kernel, then please be less obtuse, because
I'll gladly track this problem down wherever it may lead.
>
> > Why does this command run automatically when debugging with gdb from the
> > command line but when attaching to an already running process ?
>
> Because it's different code that detects the new program.
So it seems that you are well aware of this problem.
Are you recommending that the add-symbol-file-from-memory as the
current solution ?
I've downloaded the current cvs and faced the same problem.
So it seems that a half-solution to this problem which was discovered
and fixed in February, is not even in the current CVS.
If need me to enter it into bugzilla, I'm happy to do that.
Just let me know where.
I researched this problem before posting my findings here.
I'm just looking for developing the correct solution.
Thanks.
>
> --
> Daniel Jacobowitz
> CodeSourcery, LLC
--
Rich Coe richard.coe@med.ge.com
General Electric Medical Systems
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-10 21:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-10 18:00 Rich Coe
2005-06-10 18:11 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-06-10 19:02 ` Rich Coe
2005-06-10 19:05 ` H. J. Lu
2005-06-10 19:09 ` Christopher Faylor
2005-06-10 19:10 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-06-10 19:23 ` Rich Coe
2005-06-10 19:37 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-06-10 21:17 ` richard.coe [this message]
2005-06-11 0:51 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-06-11 2:21 ` H. J. Lu
2005-06-13 15:19 ` Rich Coe
2005-06-13 15:26 ` H. J. Lu
2005-06-13 15:36 ` Rich Coe
2005-06-13 20:13 ` H. J. Lu
2005-06-13 20:16 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-06-13 20:30 ` H. J. Lu
2005-06-13 20:33 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-06-13 20:36 ` Rich Coe
2005-06-13 20:43 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200506102115.QAA91634@morpheus \
--to=richard.coe@med.ge.com \
--cc=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=hjl@lucon.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox