From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29896 invoked by alias); 10 Jun 2005 19:10:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 29872 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Jun 2005 19:10:11 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 19:10:11 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DgotM-0003lv-4l; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 15:10:08 -0400 Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 19:10:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: "H. J. Lu" Cc: Rich Coe , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: no stack trace with 2.6.11 and gdb 6.3 Message-ID: <20050610191006.GA32086@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: "H. J. Lu" , Rich Coe , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <20050610125855.62ce7313@godzilla> <20050610181140.GA6207@nevyn.them.org> <20050610135940.23bd015c@godzilla> <20050610190531.GA8893@lucon.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050610190531.GA8893@lucon.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-06/txt/msg00097.txt.bz2 On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 12:05:32PM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote: > On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 01:59:40PM -0500, Rich Coe wrote: > > I downloaded the cvs snapshot gdb-6.3.50.20050607, built, and ran gdb > > and the problem still persists. > > > > What next ? > > > > Try this. > > BTW, why does's gdb use > > http://www.sourceware.org/bugzilla/ > > It is very stupid not to. Because we have PR numbers all through the source and testsuite, and don't want to ditch them. We will need a third bugzilla setup, probably. I need to find some time to talk to Dan about it. > @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ > # Target: GNU/Linux x86-64 > TDEPFILES= amd64-tdep.o amd64-linux-tdep.o \ > i386-tdep.o i387-tdep.o i386-linux-tdep.o glibc-tdep.o \ > - solib.o solib-svr4.o corelow.o > + solib.o solib-svr4.o corelow.o symfile-mem.o > DEPRECATED_TM_FILE= solib.h Since he had the add-symbol-file-from-memory command already, that can't be it, can it? But you're right, it's a bug that it's missing from linux64.mt. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC