Re: no stack trace with 2.6.11 and gdb 6.3

Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-06-10T19:10:17Z

On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 12:05:32PM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 01:59:40PM -0500, Rich Coe wrote:
> > I downloaded the cvs snapshot gdb-6.3.50.20050607, built, and ran gdb
> > and the problem still persists.
> >
> > What next ?
> >
>
> Try this.
>
> BTW, why does's gdb use
>
> http://www.sourceware.org/bugzilla/
>
> It is very stupid not to.

Because we have PR numbers all through the source and testsuite, and
don't want to ditch them. We will need a third bugzilla setup,
probably. I need to find some time to talk to Dan about it.

> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
> # Target: GNU/Linux x86-64
> TDEPFILES= amd64-tdep.o amd64-linux-tdep.o \
> i386-tdep.o i387-tdep.o i386-linux-tdep.o glibc-tdep.o \
> - solib.o solib-svr4.o corelow.o
> + solib.o solib-svr4.o corelow.o symfile-mem.o
> DEPRECATED_TM_FILE= solib.h

Since he had the add-symbol-file-from-memory command already, that
can't be it, can it? But you're right, it's a bug that it's missing
from linux64.mt.

--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC