Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Vladimir Prus <ghost@cs.msu.su>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: printing "variable-sized" registers
Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 16:58:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050530165817.GA24005@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d7f7dt$b3u$1@sea.gmane.org>

On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 06:22:19PM +0400, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> I'm working on a gdb port, and have problems with printing certain registers
> of my target. The problem is that those registers are vector buffers that
> can hold from 0 to 32 values at any given moment. I would like the 'info
> registers' command to print exactly the number of values that are present
> in a buffer. That is, on one invocation I might get 4 values printed, and
> on another 15, depending on the current processor state.
> 
> However, I don't see an easy way to do this. The
> 'default_print_registers_info' function uses 'val_print' to print the
> value, and 'val_print' uses register type (struct type*), which has a fixed
> size. Anything I can do? Or I should just write arch-specific
> 'print_registers_info' function?

The last one.  The best you can do the rest of the time is going to be
giving them a type containing the maximum number of values and fill in
with dummies - maybe also including the count?

If you want "print $reg" to display them nicely, you're going to need
to teach GDB's type system about it somehow.  I have no idea what that
change would look like or how it would work, but it could be generally
useful - it's the same concept as prettyprinting a tagged union, I think.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC


  reply	other threads:[~2005-05-30 16:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-05-30 15:10 Vladimir Prus
2005-05-30 16:58 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2005-06-06 13:52   ` Vladimir Prus
2005-06-06 13:56     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-06-06 14:05       ` Vladimir Prus

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050530165817.GA24005@nevyn.them.org \
    --to=drow@false.org \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=ghost@cs.msu.su \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox