From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5108 invoked by alias); 25 May 2005 03:37:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 5060 invoked by uid 22791); 25 May 2005 03:37:53 -0000 Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2005 03:37:53 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DamiI-0006kE-Br; Tue, 24 May 2005 23:37:46 -0400 Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 03:37:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Nick Roberts Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Consistent format for memory addresses Message-ID: <20050525033745.GA25868@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Nick Roberts , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <17043.61074.262608.156551@farnswood.snap.net.nz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <17043.61074.262608.156551@farnswood.snap.net.nz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg00308.txt.bz2 On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 03:18:42PM +1200, Nick Roberts wrote: > However "info frame" gives: > > (gdb) info frame > Stack level 0, frame at 0xbffff730: > eip = 0x80484d9 in main (myprog.c:55); saved eip 0x4006015a > ^^^^^^^^^ > > Still seven digits. The human mind adjusts easily to such differences, but > front ends---or at least the one I'm writing for Emacs---don't. I have no objection - but is it really that hard to treat it as a number? -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC