From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7099 invoked by alias); 23 May 2005 19:37:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 7086 invoked by uid 22791); 23 May 2005 19:37:21 -0000 Received: from erizo.shearer.org (HELO shearer.org) (210.10.97.33) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2005 19:37:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34170 helo=shearer.org) by shearer.org with esmtp (Dan's MTA 1.0) id 1DaIjn-0000SK-4M; Tue, 24 May 2005 05:07:19 +0930 Received: from dan by erizo.shearer.org with local (Spammer Slammer 3.141) id 1DaIjn-0000SH-0Q; Tue, 24 May 2005 05:07:19 +0930 Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 19:37:00 -0000 From: Dan Shearer To: Dan Shearer Cc: Michael Snyder , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [discuss] going back: reverse-execution vs. checkpoint/restart Message-ID: <20050523193718.GG19663@erizo.shearer.org> References: <42922617.3050805@redhat.com> <20050523193155.GF19663@erizo.shearer.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050523193155.GF19663@erizo.shearer.org> Organisation: shearer.org User-Agent: Mutt X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg00293.txt.bz2 On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 05:01:55AM +0930, Dan Shearer wrote: > True. One of the interesting things here is that while the limiting case > above is just the same as checkpointing before in terms of the technical s/before/below/ -- Dan Shearer dan@shearer.org