Re: [discuss] Support for reverse-execution

Michael Snyder
2005-05-20T21:59:02Z

>> (gdb) reverse-step
>> # reverse-stepi once (or until we leave the *current* line)
>
> BTW, this bit is a little more complicated, because we might go
> to another frame. So we might have to do some reverse-finish's
> stacked in there.

Absolutely -- I just wanted to focus on the one point.

> I think infrun will need some serious cleaning
> up to pull this off.

infrun *always* needs serious cleaning up. ;-)

Seriously, though, we'll have to add some new state,
but I think it's doable without major rewriting.