From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-21343-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 25496 invoked by alias); 30 Apr 2005 16:18:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 25452 invoked from network); 30 Apr 2005 16:17:58 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO cgf.cx) (66.30.17.189)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 30 Apr 2005 16:17:58 -0000
Received: by cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201)
	id 2E5EE13C1C8; Sat, 30 Apr 2005 12:17:58 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 20:37:00 -0000
From: Christopher Faylor <me@cgf.cx>
To: mark@codesourcery.com, drow@false.org, paul@codesourcery.com,
	gdb@sourceware.org, Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
Subject: Re: Windows support in GDB
Message-ID: <20050430161758.GB2396@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Mail-Followup-To: mark@codesourcery.com, drow@false.org,
	paul@codesourcery.com, gdb@sourceware.org,
	Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
References: <SERRANOUQ9cAgjHXwKH00000197@SERRANO.CAM.ARTIMI.COM> <42726728.4030408@codesourcery.com> <200504301429.j3UETn7w020204@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200504301429.j3UETn7w020204@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i
X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg00246.txt.bz2

On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 04:29:49PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>   Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 09:56:08 -0700
>   From: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
>
>"Oh my god.  What did I do!"
>
>Anyway, I want to thank Mark and Daniel for explaining a bit of the
>background.  The key point is that there will be people tracking gdb
>on MinGW systems fixing any accidental breakage, and willing to answer
>questions about MinGW-specific questions.  That seems to be the case.
>It'd be great if this could somehow be formalized by having a MinGW
>host maintainer (then we could clarify Christophers role as Cygwin
>host & native).

I am willing to continue to be the Windows maintainer.  Most of the
issues that I deal with in gdb are Windows related, not cygwin related.
It wouldn't make sense to have someone else worrying about Windows.

cgf