From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24758 invoked by alias); 29 Apr 2005 16:40:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18167 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2005 16:34:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cgf.cx) (66.30.17.189) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 29 Apr 2005 16:34:55 -0000 Received: by cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201) id 07EC313C1C8; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 12:34:55 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 16:46:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: Mark Mitchell , drow@false.org, paul@codesourcery.com, gdb@sourceware.org, Mark Kettenis Subject: Re: Windows support in GDB Message-ID: <20050429163455.GC12864@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Mail-Followup-To: Mark Mitchell , drow@false.org, paul@codesourcery.com, gdb@sourceware.org, Mark Kettenis References: <200504291513.j3TFDhjx021040@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <42725B31.4090800@codesourcery.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42725B31.4090800@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg00224.txt.bz2 On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 09:05:05AM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote: >I'd also note that there's a very active MinGW community out there. >Part of the reason that their GDB support is complete separate is that >they've found it hard to get their patches contributed and accepted. I've been suggesting to the MinGW community that they submit patches for some time. I don't recall anyone actually trying to do so. cgf