From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8186 invoked by alias); 25 Apr 2005 06:22:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 7643 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2005 06:21:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO topsns.toshiba-tops.co.jp) (202.230.225.5) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 25 Apr 2005 06:21:59 -0000 Received: from inside-ms1.toshiba-tops.co.jp by topsns.toshiba-tops.co.jp via smtpd (for sourceware.org [12.107.209.250]) with SMTP; 25 Apr 2005 06:21:59 UT Received: from topsms.toshiba-tops.co.jp (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.toshiba-tops.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8467D1F2B4; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 15:21:58 +0900 (JST) Received: from srd2sd.toshiba-tops.co.jp (gw-chiba7.toshiba-tops.co.jp [172.17.244.27]) by topsms.toshiba-tops.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 785F11D6D4; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 15:21:58 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost (fragile [172.17.28.65]) by srd2sd.toshiba-tops.co.jp (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j3P6Lvoj025081; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 15:21:58 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp) Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 06:22:00 -0000 Message-Id: <20050425.152157.34482010.nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp> To: jvh@tivo.com Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: gdb 6.x 'next' does not work on mips-linux/mipsel-linux From: Atsushi Nemoto In-Reply-To: References: X-Fingerprint: 6ACA 1623 39BD 9A94 9B1A B746 CA77 FE94 2874 D52F X-Pgp-Public-Key: http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x2874D52F Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg00170.txt.bz2 >>>>> On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 15:39:06 -0700, "John Van Horne" said: jvh> I just posted a note on PR 1716 about my experience with this jvh> problem. Basically, "next" on a dynamically linked library jvh> function fails for me using gdb 6.2.1, 6.3 and 6.3.50.20050420. I jvh> saw the previous posts in this thread that made it sound as jvh> though this was fixed in the 20050104 snapshot. However I jvh> couldn't find that snapshot, and the latest failed for me. I tried 6.3.50.20050329 and 6.3.50.20050424 and got same errors. It seems broken again before 20050329. FYI, my ugly hack for gdb 6.3 seems work for current snapshot too. (http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/2004-12/msg00118.html) --- Atsushi Nemoto