From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11867 invoked by alias); 24 Apr 2005 22:33:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 11283 invoked from network); 24 Apr 2005 22:32:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 24 Apr 2005 22:32:50 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.50 #1 (Debian)) id 1DPpek-0003lg-3j; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 18:32:50 -0400 Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 22:33:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Shaun Jackman Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: gdb 6.3 with an Abatron BDI2000 Message-ID: <20050424223250.GB14252@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Shaun Jackman , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <7f45d9390504201114569256c0@mail.gmail.com> <20050420182155.GA30867@nevyn.them.org> <7f45d93905042219147cf8dfad@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7f45d93905042219147cf8dfad@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg00166.txt.bz2 On Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 07:14:43PM -0700, Shaun Jackman wrote: > On 4/20/05, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 11:14:44AM -0700, Shaun Jackman wrote: > > > I'm using gdb 6.3 to debug an ARM7TDMI with an Abatron BDI2000, a > > > device which speaks the gdb remote protocol natively. Loading with gdb > > > 6.3 does not work... > > > > > > GNU gdb 6.3 > > > (gdb) target remote bdi:2001 > > > Remote debugging using bdi:2001 > > > start () at ../../arch-pathport/pathport-crt0.S:36 > > > 36 b start0 > > > Current language: auto; currently asm > > > (gdb) load > > > Loading section .text, size 0x2ac24 lma 0x2000000 > > > Memory access error while loading section .text. > > > > Try CVS GDB instead. This should be fixed. > > Do you know when this bug was introduced? I'd like to try the last > released version of gdb prior to this bug. Not sure. Probably 6.2 is OK. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC