From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-21015-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 31766 invoked by alias); 26 Mar 2005 13:44:29 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 31680 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2005 13:44:22 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lakermmtao07.cox.net) (68.230.240.32)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 26 Mar 2005 13:44:22 -0000
Received: from white ([68.9.64.121]) by lakermmtao07.cox.net
          (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with ESMTP
          id <20050326134422.EDRS19214.lakermmtao07.cox.net@white>;
          Sat, 26 Mar 2005 08:44:22 -0500
Received: from bob by white with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1DFBaT-0003zn-00; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 08:44:25 -0500
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 13:44:00 -0000
From: Bob Rossi <bob@brasko.net>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: GDB <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [mi] watchpoint-scope exec async command
Message-ID: <20050326134425.GA15345@white>
Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,
	GDB <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
References: <20050325161239.GA12231@white> <01c53207$Blat.v2.4$3def9b00@zahav.net.il>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <01c53207$Blat.v2.4$3def9b00@zahav.net.il>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-SW-Source: 2005-03/txt/msg00242.txt.bz2

On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 03:24:10PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 11:12:39 -0500
> > From: Bob Rossi <bob@brasko.net>
> > 
> > (gdb)
> > -break-watch param
> > ^done,wpt={number="2",exp="param"}
> > (gdb)
> > -exec-continue
> > ^running
> > (gdb)
> > ~"Hardware watchpoint 2 deleted because the program has left the block \n"
> > ~"in which its expression is valid.\n"
> > *stopped,reason="exited",exit-code="02"
> > (gdb)
> > 
> > Is it just a bug that there is no 'watchpoint-scope' returned?
> 
> I think it's a bug, yes: there's one instance in breakpoint.c
> (specifically, in the function insert_bp_location) that uses
> printf_filtered instead of the ui_* functions to produce the warning
> about a watchpoint that went out of scope.  I think it should use the
> same code that is used by watchpoint_check to produce a similar
> warning.

OK, I'll look into fixing this.

Bob Rossi