From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4874 invoked by alias); 6 Mar 2005 21:35:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 4862 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2005 21:35:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 6 Mar 2005 21:35:12 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.44 #1 (Debian)) id 1D83P5-0003RZ-RK; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 16:35:11 -0500 Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 21:35:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Joel Brobecker , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Ada and the "start" command Message-ID: <20050306213511.GA13223@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Joel Brobecker , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <20050306213337.GA13156@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050306213337.GA13156@nevyn.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i X-SW-Source: 2005-03/txt/msg00065.txt.bz2 On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 04:33:37PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > Hi Joel, > > Do any of the gdb.ada tests pass for you, using a clean GDB tree? My > impression is that the "start" command, upon which they all rely, can > not possibly work in FSF GDB. There's ada_main_name, which correctly > digs the name out of the executable, but it isn't hooked up to > anything. So "start" always goes to "main". > > If the tests can't work in this tree, they should be disabled. I'm not > sure what the plan for ada_main_name is. Scratch the last sentence; I found the pending patch on gdb-patches. I still do not like tests which will not yet pass being added to the source tree. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC