Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: binutils@sources.redhat.com
Cc: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: gas: should duplicate .macro directives be allowed?
Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 17:56:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050306175605.GA21686@nevyn.them.org> (raw)

My system assembler is binutils 2.15, and allows duplicate macros; the later
one wins.  GDB's testsuite relies on this; I built a combined tree and
dejagnu decided to use the in-tree assembler for asm-source.exp, which no
longer allows this.  Thus:

/nevyn/big/fsf/objects/commit-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.asm/arch.inc: Assembler messages:
/nevyn/big/fsf/objects/commit-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.asm/arch.inc:35: Error: Macro with this name was already defined

From gdb.asm/common.inc:

comment "arch.inc is responsible for defining the following macros:"
comment "enter - subroutine prologue"
comment "leave - subroutine epilogue"
comment "call - call a named subroutine"
comment "several_nops - execute several (typically 4) nops"
comment "exit0 - exit (0)"

comment "arch.inc may also override the default definitions of:"
comment "datavar - define a data variable"
comment "declare - declare the start of a subroutine"
comment "end - end a subroutine"

Then an architecture-specific file is included, in this case i386.inc.


Was the change deliberate?  If so, it needs to be documented (I'd prefer to
revert it).  It appears to have come in here:

2005-01-31  Jan Beulich  <jbeulich@novell.com>

        * macro.c (do_formals): Adjust to no longer accept empty parameter
        names.
        (define_macro): Adjust to no longer accept empty macro name, garbage
        following the parameters, or macros that were previously defined.
        * read.c (s_bad_end): Declare.
        (potable): Add endm. Handler for endr and endm is s_bad_end.
        (s_bad_end): Rename from s_bad_endr. Adjust to handle both .endm
        and .endr.
        * read.h (s_bad_endr): Remove.


-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC


             reply	other threads:[~2005-03-06 17:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-06 17:56 Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2005-03-07  7:36 Jan Beulich
2005-03-07 16:15 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2005-03-07 16:20   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-03-08  1:02     ` Erik Christiansen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050306175605.GA21686@nevyn.them.org \
    --to=drow@false.org \
    --cc=binutils@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@novell.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox