From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-20743-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 20956 invoked by alias); 22 Feb 2005 20:15:19 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 20895 invoked from network); 22 Feb 2005 20:15:13 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO tully.CS.Berkeley.EDU) (128.32.153.227)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 22 Feb 2005 20:15:13 -0000
Received: from tully.CS.Berkeley.EDU (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by tully.CS.Berkeley.EDU (8.12.7/8.12.7/3.141592645) with ESMTP id j1MKFCIh017800;
	Tue, 22 Feb 2005 12:15:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tully.CS.Berkeley.EDU (hilfingr@localhost)
	by tully.CS.Berkeley.EDU (8.12.7/8.12.7/Submit) with ESMTP id j1MKFB1q017797;
	Tue, 22 Feb 2005 12:15:11 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <200502222015.j1MKFB1q017797@tully.CS.Berkeley.EDU>
To: tj <999alfred@comcast.net>
cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Still problems with gdb and nested functions. 
In-Reply-To: Message from tj <999alfred@comcast.net> 
   of "Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:17:42 EST." <421B8556.6070905@comcast.net> 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <17793.1109103311.1@tully.CS.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 20:27:00 -0000
From: Paul Hilfinger <hilfingr@EECS.Berkeley.EDU>
X-SW-Source: 2005-02/txt/msg00138.txt.bz2


> #include <stdio.h>
> 
> int main(int argc, char *argv[]){
> 
>   int i,j;
> 
>   int inside(void){
>     int k,l;
> 
>     k = 1;
>     l = k;
>     printf("inside, k = %d, l = %d\n", k,l);
>     return 0;
> 
>   }
> 
>   inside();
>   i = 0;
>   j = 1;
> }
> 
....
> Breakpoint 1, inside.0 () at test.c:12
> 12          printf("inside, k = %d, l = %d\n", k,l);
> (gdb) p k
> No symbol "k" in current context.

I presume you have confirmed that k is actually there (since it is set
only from a constant, it could be folded away even without fancy
optimization).

Paul Hilfinger