From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22206 invoked by alias); 16 Feb 2005 04:34:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 22182 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2005 04:34:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 16 Feb 2005 04:34:08 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.44 #1 (Debian)) id 1D1Gt2-0004H7-5j; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 23:34:04 -0500 Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 12:04:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Edward Peschko Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: suppressing stepping into standard library functions Message-ID: <20050216043404.GA16406@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Edward Peschko , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <20050212061838.GA29624@venus> <20050212172417.GA1972@nevyn.them.org> <20050216041125.GA16018@venus> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050216041125.GA16018@venus> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i X-SW-Source: 2005-02/txt/msg00108.txt.bz2 On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 08:11:25PM -0800, Edward Peschko wrote: > > > when hitting 'n' in the debugging sessions really obfuscates the flow of > > > logic of the program. I'd like to step through my code, and my code only. > > > > > > Is there a way to configure gdb to avoid stepping into certain > > > classes/functions like this? > > > > Not yet - this requires support for inline functions, so that we can > > recognize when we're leaving the user code. > > so.. > > Is support for inline functions slated for 6.4? And if I compiled with > -fno-inline, could I get around this? It's slated for whenever someone does the work, so no :-) I'm not sure if -fno-inline really suppresses all inlining. May depend on your GCC. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC