From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-20712-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 11832 invoked by alias); 16 Feb 2005 04:20:09 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 11778 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2005 04:20:04 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mta01.pge.com) (131.89.129.71)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 16 Feb 2005 04:20:04 -0000
Received: from mta12.comp.pge.com (mta12.comp.pge.com [10.245.211.127])
	by mta01.pge.com (Switch-3.1.7/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id j1G4JFWc007362;
	Tue, 15 Feb 2005 20:19:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from venus.comp.pge.com (venus.comp.pge.com [10.244.96.57])
	by mta12.comp.pge.com (Switch-3.1.7/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id j1G4JFp4021509;
	Tue, 15 Feb 2005 20:19:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from esp5@localhost)
	by venus.comp.pge.com (8.8.8p2+Sun/8.8.8) id UAA16042;
	Tue, 15 Feb 2005 20:11:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Authentication-Warning: venus.comp.pge.com: esp5 set sender to esp5@pge.com using -f
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 04:34:00 -0000
From: Edward Peschko <esp5@pge.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: suppressing stepping into standard library functions
Message-ID: <20050216041125.GA16018@venus>
References: <20050212061838.GA29624@venus> <20050212172417.GA1972@nevyn.them.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050212172417.GA1972@nevyn.them.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-SW-Source: 2005-02/txt/msg00107.txt.bz2

> > when hitting 'n' in the debugging sessions really obfuscates the flow of 
> > logic of the program. I'd like to step through my code, and my code only.
> > 
> > Is there a way to configure gdb to avoid stepping into certain
> > classes/functions like this?
> 
> Not yet - this requires support for inline functions, so that we can
> recognize when we're leaving the user code.

so..

Is support for inline functions slated for 6.4? And if I compiled with
-fno-inline, could I get around this?

Ed