From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-20689-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 8146 invoked by alias); 12 Feb 2005 02:53:51 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 7641 invoked from network); 12 Feb 2005 02:53:45 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO copland.sibelius.xs4all.nl) (24.75.92.210)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 12 Feb 2005 02:53:45 -0000
Received: from copland.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost.sibelius.xs4all.nl [127.0.0.1])
	by copland.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j1C2rgae012023
	for <gdb@sources.redhat.com>; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 03:53:42 +0100 (CET)
Received: (from kettenis@localhost)
	by copland.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j1C2rfUc003498;
	Fri, 11 Feb 2005 21:53:41 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 03:51:00 -0000
Message-Id: <200502120253.j1C2rfUc003498@copland.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
From: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@gnu.org>
To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: i18n and internal errors
X-SW-Source: 2005-02/txt/msg00084.txt.bz2

Hi folks,

Should we really be marking internal errors for translation?  I think
we shouldn't.  These are all messages the end-user shouldn't be
seeing.  Having them translated, makes it only more difficult for us
to fix bugs.

Mark