From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-20606-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 14261 invoked by alias); 1 Feb 2005 16:10:32 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 13085 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2005 16:10:16 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lakermmtao01.cox.net) (68.230.240.38)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 1 Feb 2005 16:10:16 -0000
Received: from white ([68.9.64.121]) by lakermmtao01.cox.net
          (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-117-20041022) with ESMTP
          id <20050201161012.GJMX11542.lakermmtao01.cox.net@white>;
          Tue, 1 Feb 2005 11:10:12 -0500
Received: from bob by white with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1Cw0bV-0002hK-00; Tue, 01 Feb 2005 11:10:13 -0500
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2005 16:10:00 -0000
From: 'Bob Rossi' <bob@brasko.net>
To: Dave Korn <dave.korn@artimi.com>
Cc: 'GDB' <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: How do I get regexp from expect at gdb_expect?
Message-ID: <20050201161012.GD9962@white>
Mail-Followup-To: Dave Korn <dave.korn@artimi.com>,
	'GDB' <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
References: <20050201143917.GB9962@white> <NUTMEGvFSS9SUhbuAb3000003dd@NUTMEG.CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <NUTMEGvFSS9SUhbuAb3000003dd@NUTMEG.CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-SW-Source: 2005-02/txt/msg00011.txt.bz2

On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 03:58:40PM -0000, Dave Korn wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: gdb-owner On Behalf Of Bob Rossi
> > Sent: 01 February 2005 14:39
> 
> > With all of this in mind, does disabling the 'echoing' of the terminal
> > sound reasonable?
> 
> 
>   .... just so long as you create a duplicate of the entire existing testsuite
> that runs without echos, in order to be sure that _both_ modes work ....  <g>

Honestly, I could be way off on this, but I don't think that the 'echo'
feature of the MI testsuite is testing anything important. In fact, the
front ends using GDB in this way will never see the 'echo'd' data.

I sort of think it would make complete sense to have Expect not look at
the 'echo'd' data from the terminal. After all, the MI interface wasn't
meant to be run on the terminal ...

Bob Rossi