From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: cagney@gnu.org
Cc: schwab@suse.de, eliz@gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com,
bintuils@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Bring back the intl subdirectory please
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 20:29:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200501242028.j0OKSqTQ001507@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41F551BF.10603@gnu.org> (message from Andrew Cagney on Mon, 24 Jan 2005 14:51:27 -0500)
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 14:51:27 -0500
From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
Mark,
You are aware of this patch, right?
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2005-01/msg00232.html
I might not be reading that patch right, but AFAICT that still assumes
that GNU gettext is available (either in libc or as a seperately
installed package). On most non-GNU systems that isn't the case, and
even if you install it on OpenBSD using the port, it will not be found
since the system compiler doesn't search in /usr/local by default.
We currently have at least six bug reports of people trying to build
GDB 6.3, where things fail (in bfd/) because libintl.h cannot be
found. I think it is safe to conclude that removing intl/ from the
distribution was a mistake since GDB no longer builds out of the box
on most pristine non-GNU systems. IIRC we removed intl/ only to fix
problems on non-GNU systems. Looks like it breaks far more systems
than it fixes. We should really release a GDB 6.3.1 with intl/ added
back in. I'm sorry that I didn't notice this before, but I simply
never removed intl/ from my local source tree, so I didn't notice the
breakage.
Mark
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-24 20:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-22 16:04 Mark Kettenis
2005-01-22 18:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-01-22 19:12 ` Andreas Schwab
2005-01-23 14:09 ` Mark Kettenis
2005-01-24 19:51 ` Andrew Cagney
2005-01-24 20:29 ` Mark Kettenis [this message]
2005-01-24 21:24 ` Andrew Cagney
2005-01-25 20:51 ` Mark Kettenis
2005-01-26 15:56 ` Andrew Cagney
2005-01-26 16:20 ` Mark Kettenis
2005-01-26 20:07 ` Andrew Cagney
2005-01-26 23:28 ` Mark Kettenis
2005-01-23 14:13 ` Mark Kettenis
2005-01-23 21:45 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-01-24 18:03 ` Ian Lance Taylor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200501242028.j0OKSqTQ001507@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl \
--to=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
--cc=bintuils@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=cagney@gnu.org \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=schwab@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox