Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Tarun <tarun@acmet.com>
Cc: 'Peter Barada' <peter@the-baradas.com>,
	gdb@sources.redhat.com, acmet@vsnl.net, ranjeeta@acmet.com,
	rm_nair@acmet.com
Subject: Re: Query regarding assembly level debugging support
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 13:57:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041208135704.GA16388@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000a01c4dcf3$d9bf19c0$a100a8c0@u8test4>

On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 12:32:12PM +0530, Tarun wrote:
> Thanks for the information. But my query still remains "Can we step
> through assembly code?"
> I know GDB supports assembly-level debugging but that refers to inline
> assembly. To make the point clear, please look at snip below. For the
> sample code segment:
> <snip>
>        /* Print the top of the stack if no index is specified. */
>        if (which < 0)
>          {
>            which = stack->top - 1;
>            if (which < 0)   
> <snip>
> 
> The inline assembly is (assume) represented as: 
> <snip>
>        /* Print the top of the stack if no index is specified. */
>        if (which < 0)
> 		.frame	$fp,16,$31	<-
> 		.mask	0x40000000,-8  <-
> 		.fmask	0x00000000,0   <-
> 		subu	$sp,$sp,16        <-
>          {
>            which = stack->top - 1;
> 		li	$2,20	            <-
> 		sw	$2,0($fp)           <-
>            if (which < 0)   
> <snip>
> 
> 
> Does GDB refer to stepping through the above code as assembly-level
> debugging?

No.

> If yes, then my requirement is little different. I want to debug the
> assembly code itself keeping it as the source code (and not the C
> source). To be more specific I want to debug hand written assembly code
> (and not the one generated by compiler)

Please see my earlier response:

  Are you saying that your source code is assembly, and your assembler
  creates debug information for it?  This should work in GDB; make sure
  that the .debug_line information is correct.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz


  reply	other threads:[~2004-12-08 13:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-12-02  9:15 Tarun
2004-12-02 14:10 ` Peter Barada
2004-12-08  7:04   ` Tarun
2004-12-08 13:57     ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2004-12-02 14:24 ` Daniel Jacobowitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20041208135704.GA16388@nevyn.them.org \
    --to=drow@false.org \
    --cc=acmet@vsnl.net \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=peter@the-baradas.com \
    --cc=ranjeeta@acmet.com \
    --cc=rm_nair@acmet.com \
    --cc=tarun@acmet.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox