From: "John David Anglin" <dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca>
To: randolph@tausq.org
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: pc_requires_run_before_use
Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2004 01:01:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200412040101.iB411Jnl013389@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041204003819.GM6359@tausq.org> from "Randolph Chung" at Dec 3, 2004 07:38:20 pm
> # ??rehrauer: Currently, this doesn't work, but we do catch the case
> # and explicitly disallow it. The reason it fails appears to be that
> #
> # [1] gdb consults only the linker symbol table in this scenario, and
> # [2] For a shlib function that is only indirectly called from the
> # main a.out, there is in the linker symbol table a stub whose
> # address is negative. Possibly this is to be interpreted as
> # an index into the DLT??
>
> interestingly, this only triggers when calling a function in a
> user-defined shared object. in my original test program which calls a
> function in libc.sl, the problem doesn't occur. i don't know why yet....
> i wish there were a "readelf" equivalent for SOM... :)
Have you tried odump? There is a manpage for it on uly3.
> using the same testcase on linux, the reference to the shared object
> function is not picked up by gdb for the main program before the app is
> started, so the problem doesn't exist. i guess this may be a problem
> with the SOM reader where it records a symbol for the unresolved
> reference to a shlib function....
I haven't looked into the mechanics of this as I did for linux. There is
info on binding in the ld and dld.sl manpages. There is a millicode
routine $$sh_func_adrs that performs function pointer canonicalization.
Possibly, understanding the deferred binding mechanism may allow you
to detect unresolved references to shlib functions.
This is obviously a pain for the user who wants to place a break
on such a function. I usely use static linkage or immediate binding
when I encounter problems such as this.
Dave
--
J. David Anglin dave.anglin@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca
National Research Council of Canada (613) 990-0752 (FAX: 952-6602)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-04 1:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-23 21:43 pc_requires_run_before_use Randolph Chung
2004-11-24 3:55 ` pc_requires_run_before_use John David Anglin
2004-11-24 6:47 ` pc_requires_run_before_use Randolph Chung
2004-12-04 0:38 ` pc_requires_run_before_use Randolph Chung
2004-12-04 1:01 ` John David Anglin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200412040101.iB411Jnl013389@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca \
--to=dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=randolph@tausq.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox