From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15475 invoked by alias); 17 Nov 2004 02:11:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 15423 invoked from network); 17 Nov 2004 02:11:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 17 Nov 2004 02:11:09 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iAH2B47T021877; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 21:11:09 -0500 Received: from post-office.corp.redhat.com (post-office.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.227]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id iAH2B4r15609; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 21:11:04 -0500 Received: from greed.delorie.com (dj.cipe.redhat.com [10.0.0.222]) by post-office.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id iAH2B3823685; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 21:11:03 -0500 Received: from greed.delorie.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by greed.delorie.com (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iAH2B36J031146; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 21:11:03 -0500 Received: (from dj@localhost) by greed.delorie.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id iAH2B3s2031142; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 21:11:03 -0500 Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 03:28:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200411170211.iAH2B3s2031142@greed.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: ian@wasabisystems.com CC: binutils@sourceware.org, gdb@sourceware.org In-reply-to: (message from Ian Lance Taylor on 16 Nov 2004 20:53:05 -0500) Subject: Re: gcc/intl vs. src/intl References: X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00181.txt.bz2 > Presumably the long-term fix would to keep intl in sync as we keep > libiberty in sync. Note: the key to doing this is automatically to let one repository (presumably, src) relinquish control of src/intl to the other (gcc), so that the sync scripts only have to work one way. We do this for libiberty. Keeping them in sync automatically is not practical if patches are allowed on both sides. This is the case for toplevel.