From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20744 invoked by alias); 9 Nov 2004 16:07:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 20402 invoked from network); 9 Nov 2004 16:07:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 9 Nov 2004 16:07:06 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.34 #1 (Debian)) id 1CRYWP-0005bX-Ki; Tue, 09 Nov 2004 11:07:05 -0500 Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 16:55:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Andrew Cagney Cc: Mark Kettenis , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC] Is skip_prologue_using_sal actually usable? Message-ID: <20041109160705.GA21477@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Cagney , Mark Kettenis , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <200411071355.iA7DtfTE002934@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <4190D933.5070006@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4190D933.5070006@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00085.txt.bz2 On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 09:50:27AM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: > Mark, > > DWARF 2 provides us with the exact location[s] of a prologue end, can we > use that? No compiler I know of emits it. GCC could be fixed to. But then which meaning to you want GCC to give to it? Too much, or too little? -- Daniel Jacobowitz