From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-19999-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 12085 invoked by alias); 29 Oct 2004 17:52:11 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 12057 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2004 17:52:06 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO walton.sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 29 Oct 2004 17:52:06 -0000
Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl [192.168.0.2])
	by walton.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id i9THq5rc023554;
	Fri, 29 Oct 2004 19:52:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.12.6p3/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i9THq59k001382;
	Fri, 29 Oct 2004 19:52:05 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from kettenis@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl)
Received: (from kettenis@localhost)
	by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.12.6p3/8.12.6/Submit) id i9THq3JQ001379;
	Fri, 29 Oct 2004 19:52:03 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 17:27:00 -0000
Message-Id: <200410291752.i9THq3JQ001379@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
From: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@gnu.org>
To: schwab@suse.de
CC: gdb@sources.redhat.com
In-reply-to: <je3bzxwnu6.fsf@sykes.suse.de> (message from Andreas Schwab on
	Fri, 29 Oct 2004 17:22:57 +0200)
Subject: Re: infrun.c:2642: internal-error:
 insert_step_resume_breakpoint_at_sal: Assertion `step_resume_breakpoint ==
 NULL' failed dot
References:  <je3bzxwnu6.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg00426.txt.bz2

   From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
   Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 17:22:57 +0200

   I'm getting this assertion failure on ia64-linux when stepping after a
   breakpoint with a signal also being delivered.  Both calls to
   insert_step_resume_breakpoint_at_sal are coming from the two calls to
   insert_step_resume_breakpoint_at_frame in handle_inferior_event.  In both
   calls the actual address where the breakpoint is to be set is the same.  I
   haven't been able to come up with a small test case, this happens while
   debugging Emacs.

I'm seeing the same problem on NetBSD/amd64 in the regular testsuite
(sigstep.exp).  Haven't found the time yet to look into it though.

Mark