From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26687 invoked by alias); 17 Oct 2004 18:59:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 26678 invoked from network); 17 Oct 2004 18:59:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 17 Oct 2004 18:59:02 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.34 #1 (Debian)) id 1CJGFB-00068H-7k; Sun, 17 Oct 2004 14:59:01 -0400 Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 21:00:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Craig Jeffree Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: gdb acceptance of gcc's -feliminate-dwarf2-dups code Message-ID: <20041017185901.GB23181@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Craig Jeffree , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <1094603624.14297.88.camel@cosmo.preston.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1094603624.14297.88.camel@cosmo.preston.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg00345.txt.bz2 On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 10:33:44AM +1000, Craig Jeffree wrote: > Hi, > Back in January someone provided a patch to allow gdb to accept code > generated with the gcc option -feliminate-dwarf2-dups. This patch could > not be accepted for various reasons detailed in a thread on gdb-patches > (http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2004-01/msg00386.html). > > At the time others indicated that this feature would be added very > soon, however it appears as though it is still outstanding. Is this > correct? Is anyone working on a patch for this feature? We are stuck > using gcc 2.95.3 because our debug binary is over 900M already, it gets > _much_ bigger if we use gcc 3.x - however this duplicate removal helps > keep the blowout somewhat reasonable. > > Are there others who need this patch? Hi Craig, FYI, the next release of GDB or current CVS snapshots should work OK. -- Daniel Jacobowitz