From: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@gnu.org>
To: ashishm@linsyssoft.com
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Possible improvement to i386 function prologue analysis.
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 18:42:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200410151749.i9FHnwnD000753@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <416FC732.2020609@linsyssoft.com> (message from ashish mittal on Fri, 15 Oct 2004 18:18:50 +0530)
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 18:18:50 +0530
From: ashish mittal <ashishm@linsyssoft.com>
Hi,
0807a380 <captured_main>:
807a380: 55 push %ebp
807a381: 31 c0 xor %eax,%eax
807a383: 89 e5 mov %esp,%ebp
807a385: 57 push %edi
807a386: 31 d2 xor %edx,%edx
807a388: 31 c9 xor %ecx,%ecx
807a38a: 56 push %esi
807a38b: 53 push %ebx
807a38c: 81 ec 4c 01 00 00 sub $0x14c,%esp
In the above instance, the function "i386_analyze_register_saves()",
which takes care of populating the frame cache, will fail after reading
the first register %edi.
Hi Ashish,
Thanks for your mail. I agree with you analysis. There's even a
KFAILing test in the testsuite for a very similar problem.
Please suggest if it would be worthwhile to work on a similar check for
special instructions within the for loop in i386_analyze_register_saves().
This will enable it to continue reading saved registers over such
occurances.
It's not as important as getting the stack frame setup right (which is
why the code in i386_analyze_frame_setup is there), but it would
certainly be nice to have it. There a slight complication though.
The prologue analyzing stuff is also used for implementing
i386_skip_prologue(). Now i386_skip_prologue() shouldn't dwell too
far into the function. Skipping the instructions we're talking about
here might just do that.
I could work on a possible patch if you agree.
That'd be great.
Mark
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-15 17:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-15 14:56 ashish mittal
2004-10-15 18:42 ` Mark Kettenis [this message]
2004-10-15 22:26 ` Dave Korn
2004-10-15 22:34 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200410151749.i9FHnwnD000753@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl \
--to=kettenis@gnu.org \
--cc=ashishm@linsyssoft.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox