From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27655 invoked by alias); 8 Oct 2004 13:43:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 27647 invoked from network); 8 Oct 2004 13:43:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 8 Oct 2004 13:43:18 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.34 #1 (Debian)) id 1CFv1i-0000QN-La; Fri, 08 Oct 2004 09:43:18 -0400 Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2004 16:34:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Eli Zaretskii , cagney@gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Bob's MI objective Message-ID: <20041008134318.GB1467@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , cagney@gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <416451B0.3060306@gnu.org> <20041006212652.GB13271@white> <20041008023243.GA15320@white> <01c4ad2b$Blat.v2.2.2$f25b86a0@zahav.net.il> <20041008121321.GB15978@white> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041008121321.GB15978@white> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg00260.txt.bz2 On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 08:13:21AM -0400, Bob Rossi wrote: > It is important to me that the CVS snapshots try to at least honor the > last major MI version before the version bump. Is this something > everyone thinks will be possible? Try, yes. Succeed, no, not always. In an earlier message I described various fixes to GDB's internals which would make honoring an MI protocol that did not express them extremely difficult. -- Daniel Jacobowitz