From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2386 invoked by alias); 6 Oct 2004 19:19:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2378 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2004 19:19:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lakermmtao09.cox.net) (68.230.240.30) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 6 Oct 2004 19:19:51 -0000 Received: from white ([68.9.64.121]) by lakermmtao09.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.04 201-2131-111-106-20040729) with ESMTP id <20041006191951.TVN16473.lakermmtao09.cox.net@white>; Wed, 6 Oct 2004 15:19:51 -0400 Received: from bob by white with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CFHKI-0003QJ-00; Wed, 06 Oct 2004 15:19:50 -0400 Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2004 19:20:00 -0000 From: Bob Rossi To: Andrew Cagney Cc: GDB Subject: Re: probing GDB for MI versions Message-ID: <20041006191950.GP12213@white> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Cagney , GDB References: <20041003170104.GC7030@white> <41644306.2090603@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41644306.2090603@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg00180.txt.bz2 On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 03:09:58PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: > If a current GDB were modified to list mi "versions" then it would only > print mi2, which is the version selected by -i=mi. If your front end > specifies -i=mi1 then you're on your own - it's not tested - it doesn't > work. WHAT?!? This is what I have been asking all along? It was the foundation to this conversation. Where were you to inform everyone of this? Are you saying that old versions of MI are not supported by GDB? Only the last official release of the MI protocol is supported and that no other versions that it used to speak with are supported or tested? Thanks, Bob Rossi