From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31050 invoked by alias); 6 Oct 2004 17:55:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 31027 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2004 17:55:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 6 Oct 2004 17:55:42 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.34 #1 (Debian)) id 1CFG0q-0002dq-7C; Wed, 06 Oct 2004 13:55:40 -0400 Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2004 17:56:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: GDB 6.3 branch 2004-10-16-ish Message-ID: <20041006175540.GB9904@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Cagney , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <41642D8E.6090207@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41642D8E.6090207@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg00164.txt.bz2 On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 01:38:22PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: > The two big lumps appear to have been swallowed - ada and ICU. There's > still stuff floating around for instance: > > - end-of-life deprecated_registers > - end-of-life xm file (that looks likely to slip) > > I might get bored and mark up gdb over the weekend the comming weekend. > But others, such as the bfd stuff needed to de-hack vsyscall are going > to have to slip out. Ignoring the de-hacking, how about actually connecting it? I'm still waiting for the two corresponding failures in corefile.exp to go away. -- Daniel Jacobowitz