From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21698 invoked by alias); 6 Oct 2004 17:45:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21682 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2004 17:45:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO takamaka.act-europe.fr) (142.179.108.108) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 6 Oct 2004 17:45:40 -0000 Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id 4017E47D98; Wed, 6 Oct 2004 10:45:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2004 17:48:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: GDB 6.3 branch 2004-10-16-ish Message-ID: <20041006174539.GP1282@gnat.com> References: <41642D8E.6090207@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41642D8E.6090207@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg00160.txt.bz2 > The two big lumps appear to have been swallowed - ada and ICU. There's > still stuff floating around for instance: > > - end-of-life deprecated_registers > - end-of-life xm file (that looks likely to slip) > > I might get bored and mark up gdb over the weekend the comming weekend. > But others, such as the bfd stuff needed to de-hack vsyscall are going > to have to slip out. > > However, I don't see anything really blocking the next release. Yes, I think we should start the release process now, I don't think the deprecated_registers issue is a big deal. I will make a point of building and testing GDB on all the Unix machines we have at AdaCore and see where we stand. -- Joel