From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3508 invoked by alias); 6 Oct 2004 16:38:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 3500 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2004 16:38:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 6 Oct 2004 16:38:28 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i96GcSEk011468 for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2004 12:38:28 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i96GcNr01944 for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2004 12:38:23 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (vpn50-37.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.37]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i96GcMpL001827 for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2004 12:38:23 -0400 Received: from saguaro (saguaro.lan [192.168.64.2]) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.11/8.12.10) with SMTP id i96GcGqX005827 for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2004 09:38:17 -0700 Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2004 16:41:00 -0000 From: Kevin Buettner To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: View registers from stack frames Message-Id: <20041006093816.64f8ac8f@saguaro> In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.1.20041006084237.01cf98c0@NT_SERVER> References: <5.2.0.9.1.20041005171658.01d208e0@NT_SERVER> <20041005140227.GA13586@nevyn.them.org> <5.2.0.9.1.20041005154532.01d52ec0@NT_SERVER> <5.2.0.9.1.20041005142840.01d03818@NT_SERVER> <5.2.0.9.1.20041005142840.01d03818@NT_SERVER> <5.2.0.9.1.20041005154532.01d52ec0@NT_SERVER> <5.2.0.9.1.20041005171658.01d208e0@NT_SERVER> <5.2.0.9.1.20041006084237.01cf98c0@NT_SERVER> Organization: Red Hat Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg00132.txt.bz2 On Wed, 06 Oct 2004 08:53:31 +0200 Fabian Cenedese wrote: > The first two frames seem ok, only frame 3 and more are wrong. > If more info is needed (e.g. the remote debug protocol) I can also > post it here or send to anyone. > > Well, that only leaves me with the cvs version... Give the CVS version a try. If that fails too, could you send me a test case? Thanks, Kevin