From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30808 invoked by alias); 26 Sep 2004 19:00:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 30799 invoked from network); 26 Sep 2004 19:00:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO walton.sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 26 Sep 2004 19:00:46 -0000 Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl [192.168.0.2]) by walton.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id i8QJ0jJq009950 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 21:00:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.12.6p3/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i8QJ0iAH001347 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 21:00:44 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from kettenis@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl) Received: (from kettenis@localhost) by elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.12.6p3/8.12.6/Submit) id i8QJ0iXs001344; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 21:00:44 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 19:00:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200409261900.i8QJ0iXs001344@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> From: Mark Kettenis To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: NAT_FILE always required? X-SW-Source: 2004-09/txt/msg00233.txt.bz2 It looks as if I'm ready to get rid of NAT_FILE for *BSD/amd64. Except there's this funny bit of code in configure.in: if test "${nativefile}" = ""; then < Makefile \ sed -e '/^NATDEPFILES[[ ]]*=.*\\$/,/[[^\\]]$/s/^/# /' \ -e '/^NATDEPFILES[[ ]]*=/s/^/# /' \ | sed -e '/^\(NATDEPFILES[[ ]]*[[+]]=[[ ]]*\)/s//# \1/' \ > Makefile.tem mv -f Makefile.tem Makefile fi This code comments out the definition of NATDEPFILES if NAT_FILE isn't there. What's the purpose of this code? Can anybody see a reason why this code can't be deleted? Mark