From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5466 invoked by alias); 24 Sep 2004 18:48:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 5437 invoked from network); 24 Sep 2004 18:48:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO web41521.mail.yahoo.com) (66.218.94.128) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 24 Sep 2004 18:48:02 -0000 Message-ID: <20040924184801.10426.qmail@web41521.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [136.1.1.101] by web41521.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 11:48:01 PDT X-RocketYMMF: kelleycook Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 18:48:00 -0000 From: Kelley Cook Reply-To: kcook@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: bison problem To: Paul Hilfinger , gdb@sources.redhat.com, drow@false.org, DJ Delorie , binutils@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <200409241808.i8OI8iu3029162@tully.CS.Berkeley.EDU> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2004-09/txt/msg00216.txt.bz2 --- Paul Hilfinger wrote: > > Daniel & Kelley, > > Oh dear. I went and changed the GDB Makefile.in, assuming that was > intended, so that it conforms to Kelley's patch. Sorry. My bad. > > Paul Hilfinger A grep search shows that GCC has no need for either the old or new ylwrap. So which version is chosen for src/ is immaterial to me. If anyone wishes to make sure that everything within src/ works with the new-style ylwrap ("new-style" apparently being 1998, when ylwrap's command order changed) and re-upgrade the toplevel in both trees then please feel free. Though it may be a nice cleanup, as I don't even have write access to src/, I clearly won't be the one doing it. BTW, DJ to prevent this from happening again, would it be possible to just delete ylwrap from GCC's—but not from src's—toplevel directory as it is not used anywhere within GCC. KC