From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10138 invoked by alias); 23 Sep 2004 11:46:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10077 invoked from network); 23 Sep 2004 11:46:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lakermmtao08.cox.net) (68.230.240.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 23 Sep 2004 11:46:04 -0000 Received: from white ([68.9.64.121]) by lakermmtao08.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.04 201-2131-111-106-20040729) with ESMTP id <20040923114603.RPLV7122.lakermmtao08.cox.net@white>; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 07:46:03 -0400 Received: from bob by white with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CAS30-0000Fb-00; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 07:46:02 -0400 Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 11:46:00 -0000 From: Bob Rossi To: Fabian Cenedese Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Unimplemented MI commands Message-ID: <20040923114602.GA408@white> Mail-Followup-To: Fabian Cenedese , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <5.2.0.9.1.20040923093618.01d3f068@NT_SERVER> <5.2.0.9.1.20040923113200.01d1f670@NT_SERVER> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.1.20040923113200.01d1f670@NT_SERVER> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-SW-Source: 2004-09/txt/msg00198.txt.bz2 On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 11:33:07AM +0200, Fabian Cenedese wrote: > > >I've seen in mi/mi-cmds.c that about half of the mi commands are not > >implemented yet. Are there plans for them? Or do I need to use the > >normal console interface for these commands? I'm especially > >interested in the -symbol-* functions where only one is available now. > > Replying to myself. > > I've found this mail with a patch, why wasn't that included then? > > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2002-09/msg00302.html Yes, only half of the functions are implemented. Not speaking for the GDB people, but only for myself, I don't think they have any intention on implementing the rest of the commands. However, if you need a certain command maybe it would be done for you. However, I think that if you need certain commands, it would be much better to add an mi command, rather than use the CLI output. Bob Rossi