From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Paul Gilliam <pgilliam@us.ibm.com>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Problem building GDB on Power64
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 17:59:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040902175859.GA16559@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200409021052.04994.pgilliam@us.ibm.com>
On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 10:52:04AM -0700, Paul Gilliam wrote:
> On Thursday 02 September 2004 10:21, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 09:20:53AM -0700, Paul Gilliam wrote:
> > > On a ppc64 system, GDB builds as a 32-bit application. This is OK if the
> > > 64-bit dev. env. is not available. But if it is, this is wrong: GDB
> > > should build as a 64-bit application so that both 64 and 32 bit apps can
> > > be debugged.
> > >
> > > If I understood the configure process, I would have tried submitting a
> > > patch. It should be easy: just include -m64 in the CFLAGS. And make sure
> > > to link with the 64-bit libraries (which had better be there).
> >
> > IMO, if your 64-bit environment defaults to building 32-bit code, it's
> > your responsibility to set -m64 yourself.
>
> Normally I would agree with you, but this is kind of a special case.
>
> The reason the 64-bit environment defaults to building 32-bit code is that it
> was felt that most applications running on a 64-bit processor will be 32-bit
> applications. (at least that's what the gcc person in the next cube explained
> to me).
>
> But, if possible, the debugger should handle either. In fact, the gdb
> installed with the 64-bit dev. system is a 64-bit app. and can debug both 64
> and 32 bit apps.
>
> In this case, then, I think it makes more sense for gdb to build atomaticly as
> a 64-bit app, if it can be.
I really don't agree - I think it's the packager's or builder's job to do this.
> PS: I'm not asking for someone to post patches to configure.in or what ever,
> (hinting maybe), but I am asking for some pointers on where to look.
This would be very tricky to do. GDB links to libraries built in the
same tree, so nothing in gdb/configure.in would work. It would have to
be in the top level, which is shared with binutils and gcc and so on.
You don't want them to default to being 64-bit apps, because they
should obey the system policy of defaulting to 32-bit.
I really think this is your responsibility when building GDB if you
want it to support 64-bit binaries.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-02 17:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-02 16:23 Paul Gilliam
2004-09-02 17:22 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-09-02 17:54 ` Paul Gilliam
2004-09-02 17:59 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2004-09-02 18:51 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-09-02 20:17 ` Michael Chastain
2004-09-02 20:30 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040902175859.GA16559@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=pgilliam@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox