From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24997 invoked by alias); 1 Sep 2004 18:53:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24870 invoked from network); 1 Sep 2004 18:53:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smoothsmoothie.com) (198.87.242.244) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 1 Sep 2004 18:53:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 19485 invoked by uid 1000); 1 Sep 2004 18:57:42 -0000 Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2004 18:53:00 -0000 From: Jay Monkman To: Mark Beckwith Cc: Jay Monkman , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: bdi2000 and gdb (newbie question) Message-ID: <20040901185741.GD9529@smoothsmoothie.com> References: <20040826205715.GF6632@john.intrig.com> <20040826221713.GH14665@smoothsmoothie.com> <20040827162407.GI6632@john.intrig.com> <20040827175419.GD26065@smoothsmoothie.com> <20040901161829.GI14091@john.intrig.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fXStkuK2IQBfcDe+" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040901161829.GI14091@john.intrig.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i X-SW-Source: 2004-09/txt/msg00006.txt.bz2 --fXStkuK2IQBfcDe+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 1028 On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 11:18:29AM -0500, Mark Beckwith wrote: > error when I do the "target remote" command. Would this be possible? If > so I would like to volunteer. That might be a limitation with the remote protocol. I don't think there's any info in it declaring the architecture type. > So I'm debugging just fine now out of ram. However, when I set BREAKMODE > HARD and try to step through flash, only one breakpoint gets hit, and then > can't step or set another. The documentation I've read states that the > breakpoint will be cleared once it is hit, but that doesn't seem to be What documentation? I've never seen it remove the breakpoint permanently unless I delete it. > happening. Also the delete command doesn't seem to clear the hardware > breakpoint. I have to do a "ci" all the time from the bdi. Any > suggestions on working with hardware breakpoints?=20 Did you insert the breakpoint with gdb? If you are running from RAM, you will probably have better success if you use soft breakpoints. --fXStkuK2IQBfcDe+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline Content-length: 189 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBNhulxcGMvvluubARAl1BAJ9eO/KzuMOvGLNXXbHIQ5EirtSi4QCaAsfm XbC+Ll68Z6FJTiaPt3YEYEc= =4Zkd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fXStkuK2IQBfcDe+--