From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-19073-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 11368 invoked by alias); 16 Aug 2004 18:59:35 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 11358 invoked from network); 16 Aug 2004 18:59:34 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 16 Aug 2004 18:59:34 -0000
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i7GIxTe3022837
	for <gdb@sources.redhat.com>; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 14:59:34 -0400
Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156])
	by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i7GIxTa11155;
	Mon, 16 Aug 2004 14:59:29 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain (vpn50-19.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.19])
	by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i7GIxSEE009216;
	Mon, 16 Aug 2004 14:59:29 -0400
Received: from saguaro (saguaro.lan [192.168.64.2])
	by localhost.localdomain (8.12.11/8.12.10) with SMTP id i7GIxNEh009351;
	Mon, 16 Aug 2004 11:59:23 -0700
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 18:59:00 -0000
From: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
To: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@chello.nl>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: non-decr_pc_after_break i386 targets
Message-Id: <20040816115923.31ccb77d@saguaro>
In-Reply-To: <200408141934.i7EJY4mc001084@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org>
References: <200408141934.i7EJY4mc001084@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org>
Organization: Red Hat
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00220.txt.bz2

On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 21:34:04 +0200 (CEST)
Mark Kettenis <kettenis@chello.nl> wrote:

> However, this also reveals a flaw in the way we handle
> decr_pc_after_break.  Currently it's part of the architecture vector,
> which essentially means that we consider it part of the ISA.  However,
> the above shows that it also depends on the target interface.  So it
> seems we should make it possible for the target vector to override the
> default set by the architecture vector.
> 
> To people agree with this analysis?

Yes, I agree.

Kevin