From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2713 invoked by alias); 11 Aug 2004 20:33:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2674 invoked from network); 11 Aug 2004 20:33:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 11 Aug 2004 20:33:13 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.34 #1 (Debian)) id 1Buzmb-0000ds-IN; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 16:33:13 -0400 Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 20:33:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Jim Blandy Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: interface to partial support for DW_OP_piece in dwarf2expr.[ch] Message-ID: <20040811203312.GA1811@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Jim Blandy , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <4111145F.7000504@gnu.org> <200408050952.i759qXFK010181@juw15.nfra.nl> <9787-Fri06Aug2004123633+0300-eliz@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00182.txt.bz2 On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 03:28:05PM -0500, Jim Blandy wrote: > > Dan, does that patch correctly implement the suggestions in this > message: > > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2003-05/msg00431.html > > ? > > The answer doesn't bear directly on the central question in this > thread; whether I correctly understood Dan's suggestions from a year > ago doesn't really affect whether an arch-specific piece simplifier is > a good thing to do today. I'm just looking for a sanity check on > whether I properly understood what was requested. Absolutely it does. Thank you! -- Daniel Jacobowitz