From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22001 invoked by alias); 5 Aug 2004 21:07:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21992 invoked from network); 5 Aug 2004 21:07:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ms-smtp-01.nyroc.rr.com) (24.24.2.55) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 5 Aug 2004 21:07:14 -0000 Received: from doctormoo (syr-24-59-107-180.twcny.rr.com [24.59.107.180]) by ms-smtp-01.nyroc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i75L7AZw000051 for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 17:07:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: by doctormoo (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E02404554E; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 17:07:10 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2004 21:07:00 -0000 To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Removing leftover traces of mmalloc? Message-ID: <20040805210710.GA15265@twcny.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i From: neroden@twcny.rr.com (Nathanael Nerode) X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00087.txt.bz2 With the removal of mmalloc support from gdb, nothing in src or gcc is actually using mmalloc. Furthermore, support appears to have been removed prior to the branching of GDB 6.1. Would it be appropriate to delete the mmalloc directory and all the trailing references thereto? If not, would it at any rate be appropriate to stop shipping it with GDB and delete the various trailing references? Reply to list please. :-) -- There are none so blind as those who will not see.