From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6456 invoked by alias); 5 Aug 2004 20:48:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 6441 invoked from network); 5 Aug 2004 20:48:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO takamaka.act-europe.fr) (142.179.108.108) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 5 Aug 2004 20:48:35 -0000 Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id 1AA3B47D91; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 13:48:35 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2004 20:48:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: GDB 6.2.1? Message-ID: <20040805204835.GI1192@gnat.com> References: <41128FD4.5020702@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41128FD4.5020702@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00085.txt.bz2 > What's left for this re-spin? > - ``absolute source path'' patch > - i386 patch > - ? 2 mips-irix patches. You said in one of your earlier message that I should feel free to pull in the branch any patch I need for mips-irix. I understood that these patches needed to be checked in mainline first before they could be integrated in the branch. That's why there not in the branch yet. The first patch was under heavy discussion (about setting the right floatformat). I am not where we're headed for this one as I don't have the time to work on adding support for IRIX 128bit floats in GDB. The other one needs to be reworked because Andrew wanted to get some reorg done before we looked into this. It's on my plate. What should we do? Push a bit on the resolution of the above 2 patches? Or simply pull them in the branch as is, without having checked something in head first (this is unorthodox)? Cheers, -- Joel