From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6246 invoked by alias); 5 Aug 2004 18:47:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 6238 invoked from network); 5 Aug 2004 18:47:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 5 Aug 2004 18:47:56 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.34 #1 (Debian)) id 1BsnFk-0003Dd-Di; Thu, 05 Aug 2004 14:46:12 -0400 Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2004 18:47:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Jim Blandy Cc: Joel Brobecker , Mark Kettenis , cagney@gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: interface to partial support for DW_OP_piece in dwarf2expr.[ch] Message-ID: <20040805184611.GA12288@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Jim Blandy , Joel Brobecker , Mark Kettenis , cagney@gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <4111145F.7000504@gnu.org> <200408050952.i759qXFK010181@juw15.nfra.nl> <20040805162734.GG1192@gnat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00077.txt.bz2 On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 01:42:25PM -0500, Jim Blandy wrote: > > Without stopping discussion of the best way to handle scattered values > in core GDB, I'd still like to hear comments on my suggested change to > dwarf2expr.[ch]'s interface, if there are any. > > Because dwarf2expr is supposed to be concerned with evaluating Dwarf > expressions, and *avoid* building GDB data structures directly, I > think that change can be assessed separately from the larger (and > harder, and more important) question. I think it's fine. You spelled "yield" wrong. -- Daniel Jacobowitz