From: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@chello.nl>
To: eliz@gnu.org
Cc: brobecker@gnat.com, mec.gnu@mindspring.com, cagney@gnu.org,
gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [6.2] PROBLEMS file
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 20:51:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200407221926.i6MJQIbG001753@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2914-Thu22Jul2004221106+0300-eliz@gnu.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 22:11:06 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org>
> #0 0x7ffe0304 in ?? ()
> #1 0x77f7f4af in ntdll!ZwWaitForSingleObject () from ntdll.dll
> #2 0x77e7788b in WaitForSingleObjectEx () from /WINDOWS/system32/KERNEL32.DLL
> #3 0x00000778 in ?? ()
> #4 0x00000000 in ?? () from
> #5 0x010df2c8 in ?? ()
> #6 0x000003e8 in ?? ()
> [snip]
> Previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?)
>
> In the backtrace above, only frame 0 to 2 are correct. After that,
> GDB goes in limbo until it finally finds out that something is wrong.
That is exactly what I saw with the DJGPP port. Was the program in
your case compiled with DWARF2 debug info or with some other format?
Look at the backtrace Eli. Frame #2 is executing Microsoft shit. I
don't know what debugging format they use, and I don't think they ship
their official releases with debugging info in it.
The code looks like hand-optimized assembler. There is no hope our
unwinder can make any sense out of it without some major work. The
only thing that makes sense is somehow trust %ebp to point to some
valid frame. There is no guarantee that it doesn't point to some
garbage and if we trust it, we'll probably skip more a few frames in
the backtrace. That's why it won't be the default.
Mark
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-22 19:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-22 12:14 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-07-22 18:28 ` Joel Brobecker
2004-07-22 19:26 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-07-22 20:51 ` Mark Kettenis [this message]
2004-07-23 9:24 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-07-23 11:22 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-07-23 12:03 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-07-23 12:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-07-23 12:16 ` Dave Korn
2004-07-23 13:36 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-07-23 16:17 ` Eli Zaretskii
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-07-23 5:44 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-07-23 20:44 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-07-19 3:51 Andrew Cagney
2004-07-19 21:01 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-07-21 21:12 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-07-21 22:05 ` H. J. Lu
2004-07-22 20:58 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-07-22 21:33 ` Joel Brobecker
2004-07-22 21:38 ` H. J. Lu
2004-07-21 22:17 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-07-22 7:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-07-22 13:04 ` Dave Korn
2004-07-22 15:17 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200407221926.i6MJQIbG001753@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org \
--to=kettenis@chello.nl \
--cc=brobecker@gnat.com \
--cc=cagney@gnu.org \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=mec.gnu@mindspring.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox