Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@chello.nl>
To: eliz@gnu.org
Cc: brobecker@gnat.com, mec.gnu@mindspring.com, cagney@gnu.org,
	gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [6.2] PROBLEMS file
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 20:51:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200407221926.i6MJQIbG001753@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2914-Thu22Jul2004221106+0300-eliz@gnu.org>

   Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 22:11:06 +0200
   From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org>

   >     #0  0x7ffe0304 in ?? ()
   >     #1  0x77f7f4af in ntdll!ZwWaitForSingleObject () from ntdll.dll
   >     #2  0x77e7788b in WaitForSingleObjectEx () from /WINDOWS/system32/KERNEL32.DLL
   >     #3  0x00000778 in ?? ()
   >     #4  0x00000000 in ?? () from 
   >     #5  0x010df2c8 in ?? ()
   >     #6  0x000003e8 in ?? ()
   >     [snip]
   >     Previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?)
   > 
   > In the backtrace above, only frame 0 to 2 are correct. After that,
   > GDB goes in limbo until it finally finds out that something is wrong.

   That is exactly what I saw with the DJGPP port.  Was the program in
   your case compiled with DWARF2 debug info or with some other format?

Look at the backtrace Eli.  Frame #2 is executing Microsoft shit.  I
don't know what debugging format they use, and I don't think they ship
their official releases with debugging info in it.

The code looks like hand-optimized assembler.  There is no hope our
unwinder can make any sense out of it without some major work.  The
only thing that makes sense is somehow trust %ebp to point to some
valid frame.  There is no guarantee that it doesn't point to some
garbage and if we trust it, we'll probably skip more a few frames in
the backtrace.  That's why it won't be the default.

Mark


  reply	other threads:[~2004-07-22 19:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-07-22 12:14 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-07-22 18:28 ` Joel Brobecker
2004-07-22 19:26   ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-07-22 20:51     ` Mark Kettenis [this message]
2004-07-23  9:24       ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-07-23 11:22         ` Mark Kettenis
2004-07-23 12:03           ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-07-23 12:13             ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-07-23 12:16             ` Dave Korn
2004-07-23 13:36             ` Mark Kettenis
2004-07-23 16:17               ` Eli Zaretskii
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-07-23  5:44 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-07-23 20:44 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-07-19  3:51 Andrew Cagney
2004-07-19 21:01 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-07-21 21:12   ` Mark Kettenis
2004-07-21 22:05     ` H. J. Lu
2004-07-22 20:58       ` Mark Kettenis
2004-07-22 21:33         ` Joel Brobecker
2004-07-22 21:38         ` H. J. Lu
2004-07-21 22:17     ` Andrew Cagney
2004-07-22  7:13       ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-07-22 13:04     ` Dave Korn
2004-07-22 15:17       ` Daniel Jacobowitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200407221926.i6MJQIbG001753@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org \
    --to=kettenis@chello.nl \
    --cc=brobecker@gnat.com \
    --cc=cagney@gnu.org \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=mec.gnu@mindspring.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox