From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10856 invoked by alias); 16 Jul 2004 14:51:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10842 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2004 14:51:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 16 Jul 2004 14:51:52 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.34 #1 (Debian)) id 1BlU3J-00029Z-Cd; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 10:51:09 -0400 Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 15:25:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Gdbserver + RH9 Message-ID: <20040716145109.GA7728@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Cagney , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <20040716041109.GA23045@nevyn.them.org> <40F7E250.4010609@gnu.org> <20040716141913.GA7311@nevyn.them.org> <40F7E5D0.2050007@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40F7E5D0.2050007@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-SW-Source: 2004-07/txt/msg00209.txt.bz2 On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 10:27:28AM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: > You wrote: > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/2004-03/msg00120.html > >Anyway, let me take a stab at implementing it the way you described. > >I still think it's overkill, but I may be able to work out a way to do > >it. I think it's fairly clear that my message is resignation, not agreement. I was unable to persuade you to accept the simpler protocol that I had tested, and since then I have not been able to work out a practical way to implement the more complicated solution without rewriting all of gdbserver. Which I am not especially interested in doing, and would not be able to test without adding fault injection to GDB, since there is no reasonable way to interrupt a symbol lookup anyway. -- Daniel Jacobowitz