From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17958 invoked by alias); 16 Jul 2004 14:20:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 17935 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2004 14:19:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 16 Jul 2004 14:19:59 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.34 #1 (Debian)) id 1BlTYQ-0001vz-JD; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 10:19:14 -0400 Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:21:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Andrew Cagney Cc: "Urrutikoetxea, Eduardo" , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Gdbserver + RH9 Message-ID: <20040716141913.GA7311@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Cagney , "Urrutikoetxea, Eduardo" , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <20040716041109.GA23045@nevyn.them.org> <40F7E250.4010609@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40F7E250.4010609@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-SW-Source: 2004-07/txt/msg00206.txt.bz2 On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 10:12:32AM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: > > >Gdbserver does not support NPTL. It can not support NPTL without > >changes in the remote protocol, and no agreement was ever reached on > >how to implement them. > > There was agreement. It should adopt the `F' model. I didn't agree, so I have trouble calling that agreement. My last message with an opinion was: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/2004-03/msg00111.html -- Daniel Jacobowitz