From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24678 invoked by alias); 8 Jul 2004 18:07:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24663 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2004 18:07:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO barry.mail.mindspring.net) (207.69.200.25) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 8 Jul 2004 18:07:57 -0000 Received: from user-119a90a.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.36.10] helo=berman.michael-chastain.com) by barry.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1BidJL-0003bM-00; Thu, 08 Jul 2004 14:07:55 -0400 Received: by berman.michael-chastain.com (Postfix, from userid 502) id 6C2674B104; Thu, 8 Jul 2004 14:07:53 -0400 (EDT) To: cagney@gnu.org, dberlin@dberlin.org Subject: Re: bugzilla Cc: cgf@alum.bu.edu, gdb@sources.redhat.com Message-Id: <20040708180753.6C2674B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 18:07:00 -0000 From: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) X-SW-Source: 2004-07/txt/msg00075.txt.bz2 db> Bugs id's are global to a given bugzilla, not local to a given product. db> There exist bugs starting with the number one in there already. Thus, db> gdb bugs would have to start with the highest number at the time of the db> import. Erk, we use the bug number in other places. It's a KFAIL number, and it appears in PROBLEMS, and I link to them in my reports, and we talk about them by number. I guess we could have a flag day. As far as I know, there's no automated systems that will break, just some dangling links that we will have. Could we convert after the 6.2 release? Michael C