From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8849 invoked by alias); 8 Jul 2004 15:11:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 8816 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2004 15:11:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 8 Jul 2004 15:11:23 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.34 #1 (Debian)) id 1BiaY7-0005aJ-37; Thu, 08 Jul 2004 11:10:59 -0400 Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 15:11:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Andrew Cagney Cc: Daniel Berlin , gdb@sources.redhat.com, Christopher Faylor Subject: Re: bugzilla Message-ID: <20040708151058.GA21388@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Cagney , Daniel Berlin , gdb@sources.redhat.com, Christopher Faylor References: <40ED5AB8.9060304@gnu.org> <745BC5DA-D0EE-11D8-9149-000A95DA505C@dberlin.org> <40ED6302.3020704@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40ED6302.3020704@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-SW-Source: 2004-07/txt/msg00070.txt.bz2 On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 11:06:42AM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: > > > >On Jul 8, 2004, at 10:31 AM, Andrew Cagney wrote: > > > >>Please discuss :-) > >> > >>-- > >> > >>I've cc'd DanielB and ChrisF who would need to be involved in any > >>logistical matters. > >> > >I've converted the GDB GNATS database before with little or no problems. > >I can put the results up on www.dberlin.org/bugzilla if you want to see > >what it looks like > > > >The only real problem in conversion is that the bugs will not have the > >same PR number they used to, though they will be contiguous (IE they will > >be offset by some number). > > Why is a renumbering needed? It's our database can't we do what we > like? :-) GNATS numbers bugs independently per product; Bugzilla doesn't. There's one bugzilla installation on sources.redhat.com already, and it's shared with binutils and glibc. Um, I suppose we could set up a third copy of Bugzilla on that machine. I don't know what the issues with that would be but presumably Daniel Berlin does. -- Daniel Jacobowitz