From: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain)
To: cagney@gnu.org, mec.gnu@mindspring.com
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: duplicate test message style?
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 03:23:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040708032333.555FE4B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> (raw)
ac> PASS: gdb.base/sigbpt.exp: nopass SIGSEGV; stepi bp before segv
ac> PASS: gdb.base/sigbpt.exp: nopass SIGSEGV, stepi bp before segv
ac> PASS: gdb.base/sigbpt.exp: nopass SIGSEGV for stepi bp before segv
This rubs me the wrong way because it's a distinction that humans
would not make.
ac> PASS: gdb.base/sigbpt.exp: nopass SIGSEGV; stepi bp before segv
ac> PASS: gdb.base/sigbpt.exp: set breakpoint 0 of 1; stepi bp before segv
ac> PASS: gdb.base/sigbpt.exp: stepi out of handler; stepi bp before segv
ac> PASS: gdb.base/sigbpt.exp: clear breakpoint 0 of 1; stepi bp before segv
This is okay.
ac> PASS: gdb.base/sigbpt.exp: stepi bp before segv; nopass SIGSEGV
ac> PASS: gdb.base/sigbpt.exp: stepi bp before segv; set breakpoint 0 of 1
ac> PASS: gdb.base/sigbpt.exp: stepi bp before segv; stepi out of handler
ac> PASS: gdb.base/sigbpt.exp: stepi bp before segv; clear breakpoint 0 of 1
This is also okay.
So if you have a preference, between the two, pick the one you want.
I have a slight preference for the second form. Here's why. If I ever
notice the message, it's usually a context where I need to dig in and
and analyze it. I think it would be a little easier for me to search
off the "outer; inner" style rather than the "inner; outer style".
But both of them are pretty searchable so either is okay.
Michael C
next reply other threads:[~2004-07-08 3:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-08 3:23 Michael Elizabeth Chastain [this message]
2004-07-08 6:18 ` Joel Brobecker
2004-07-08 14:22 ` Andrew Cagney
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-07-07 21:41 Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040708032333.555FE4B104@berman.michael-chastain.com \
--to=mec.gnu@mindspring.com \
--cc=cagney@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox